﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"><channel><title>Stritar's chronolog</title><link>http://www.stritar.net</link><description>Category: Telecommunications</description><copyright>Neolab d.o.o.</copyright><ttl>5</ttl><item><title>Arthur C. Clarke envisioning the World Wide Web in 1968</title><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:10:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the greatest thrills in my life is when I stumble upon a visionary prediction in any form – text, movie, novel, painting, etc. Arthur C. Clarke, one of the most acclaimed science fiction authors of our time, did just that in his famous novel &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_(novel)" class="more" target="_blank" title="2001: A Space Odyssey (novel)"&gt;2001: A space odyssey&lt;/a&gt;. Most of us are acquainted with the plot and the scary artificial intelligence named Hal. The whole novel is really revolutionary for the age, but the thing I found most intriguing when I read it, is the detailed description of the technology we know today as the World Wide Web.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="
http://www.answers.com/topic/1968" class="more" target="_blank" title="World Chronology: 1968"&gt;1968&lt;/a&gt; was a year marked by student protests, the Vietnam war and the death of Martin Luther King. The Apollo program was well on the way, but would still need to wait one year until men could land on the moon. 1968 also marks the year when Intel, one of the biggest microchip manufacturers in the world was founded. Personal computer was still ages away, but the global network &lt;a href="http://www.computerhope.com/history/internet.htm" class="more" target="_blank" title="History of the Internet"&gt;Internet&lt;/a&gt; was already being designed. This year UCLA was selected to be the first node of the incoming new network. Since then, things evolved and formed the modern computers and the Internet as we know today, but let's take a look at what our author had to say about it then, in 1968.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"There was plenty to occupy his time, even if he did nothing but sit and read. When he tired of the official reports and memoranda and minutes he would plug his foolscap-sized newspad into the ship’s information circuit and scan the latest reports from Earth. One by one he would conjure up the world’s major electronic papers; he knew the codes of the more important ones by heart, and had no need to consult the list on the back of his pad. Switching to the display unit’s short-term memory, he would hold the front page while he quickly searched the headlines and noted the items that interested him. Each had its own two-digit reference; when he punched that, the postage-stamp-sized rectangle would expand until it neatly filled the screen, and he could read it with comfort. When he had finished he would flash back to the complete page and select a new subject for detailed examination.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Floyd sometimes wondered if the Newspad, and the fantastic technology behind it, was the last word in man’s quest for perfect communications. Here he was, far out in space, speeding away from Earth at thousand of miles an hour, yet in a few milliseconds he could see the headlines of any newspaper he pleased. (That very word ‘newspaper’, of course, was an anachronistic hang-over into the age of electronics.) The text was updated automatically on every hour; even if one read only the English versions one could spend an entire lifetime doing nothing but absorb the ever-changing flow of information from the news satellites.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;It's hard to imagine how the system could be improved or made more convenient. But sooner or later, Floyd guessed, it would pass away, to be replaced by something as unimaginable as the Newspad itself would have been to Caxton or Gutenberg.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;There was  another thought which a scanning of those tiny electronic headlines often invoked. The more wonderful the means of communication, the more trivial, tawdry of depressing its contents seemed to be. Accidents, crimes, natural and man-made disasters, threats of conflict, gloomy editorials – these still seemed to be the main concern of the millions of words being sprayed into the ether. Yet Floyd also wondered if this was altogether a bad thing; the newspapers of Utopia, he had long ago decided, would be terribly dull."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pretty impressive. His vision goes even beyond technology and well describes the role of modern news and media. Predicting all of  that in 1968 can only be marked as pure genius, and is a great example of why so many people love sci-fi. Sadly, Arthur C. Clarke passed away in 2008, but shall be remembered forever for many things. Perhaps space travel did not make it as far as he foretold, but looks like he knew how technology, information and media will look 40 years later in stunning detail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://stritar.net/Post/Arthur_C_Clarke_Envisioning_The_World_Wide_Web_In_1968.aspx</link></item><item><title>The deflation of words - from SMS to Twitter</title><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:52:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The information age brought us another interesting shock - the deflation of words. Most of the people surfing the web don't have the time to stick around and read novels. They want information and they want information fast. Sometimes I even lose hope in multimedia, when I don't feel I should watch a 2 minute long video, because 2 minutes is far too much to get to the point. The point should be straight forward and the point should be reachable in ten seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really try to keep my blog posts around 4-5 paragraphs because I introspectively see how I react to information. A post more than one monitor long does look like it is well thought and scientifically supported. So, if it looks promising, I tag it with "To read". But the problem is I've never actually done it and read it. Instead, I rather look for new, actual and aggregated information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The concentration of information started with the SMS, when a guy called Hillebrand noticed 160 characters is quite an &lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/05/invented-text-messaging.html" class="more" target="_blank" title="Why text messages are limited to 160 characters"&gt;optimal size for information&lt;/a&gt;. About 30 words or a few sentences. It turned out he set the standard for one of the most popular mobile services, text messaging. More than 20 years later, the history is repeating itself, and a concept called &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging" target="_blank" class="more" title="Microblogging"&gt;microblogging&lt;/a&gt; is taking over the world, with &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter" class="more" target="_blank" title="Twitter"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; as the most noticable service. Small chunks of dense information that are suited for the sci-fi society we live in, using 140 characters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This minimalistic approach is moving to commercial (promotional) web too. Using short and strong facts, without too much redundancy is the only way to get somebody to read how good and competitive you really are. It's an art to be able to tell a lot using a few words, but microblogging practice will surely help people to be able to express themselves briefly and effectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this fact good for culture and literature? Probably not. But it surely is good for information flow and science.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(This post has 1928 characters.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://stritar.net/Post/The_Deflation_Of_Words_From_Sms_To_Twitter.aspx</link></item></channel></rss>